Nettetlegco.gov.hk. Under the existing law every partner in a solicitor firm is li able jointly and severally with other partners for all debts, liabilities and obligations of the firm incurred while he is a partner, including those arising from any wrongful act of other partners of the firm. legco.gov.hk. legco.gov.hk. Nettet19. apr. 2012 · Q: I have a fairly straightforward question regarding a sale of land transaction. I act for the seller and I have placed a fairly standard wording for an …
Joint, several and joint and several liability Practical Law
Nettet30. apr. 2024 · It's generally easier to sue a single party who is jointly and severally liable, particularly where the other liable party is outside the jurisdiction. For joint and several … NettetBidder, whether acting as principal, agent, officer or director of an entity or otherwise, in any capacity, and the entity represented, both jointly and severally agree: To indemnify and hold harmless Booker Auction Company, its employees, agents, and its consignors (“Consignors”) from any and all actions, causes of action, suits, damages ... paliperidona generica
jointly and severallyの意味と例文|英文契約書の基本表現と例文 …
NettetJoint, several and joint and several liability. by Practical Law Dispute Resolution. Where two or more persons are liable to another, they may be jointly liable, severally liable or jointly and severally liable. This note explains the concepts of joint, several, and joint and several liability in contract and tort. Nettet24. okt. 2013 · The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, a Missouri corporation (the “Company”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kansas City Southern (the “Parent”), proposes to issue and sell to the several initial purchasers named in Schedule A hereto (the “Initial Purchasers”), acting severally and not jointly, the respective amounts set forth in such … Nettet24. jul. 2024 · However, under the minority view, “hold harmless” requires payment of both actual losses and potential liabilities, while “indemnify” protects against incurred losses only. The main difference in this case is that “hold harmless” may require a party to protect against actual losses as well as potential losses while indemnification ... エアグルーヴ 声